Click here, answer 14 questions and see your match:
http://www.wqad.com/Global/link.asp?L=259460
My results were:
highest with Hillary/Obama with tie score of 61 - inwhich I will vote Hillary
then Gravel which I've never heard of
then Romney over McCain, I was glad because I may vote for Romney if Obama were the Democratic nominee (as of today) WOW, me voting for Republican President??!! That shocks me! I don't like ALL of Romney's views; however I like the way he "reasons," especially about business/economy.
Thursday, January 31, 2008
Find Your Match in a President
Posted by
Suzette
at
Thursday, January 31, 2008
0
comments
Labels: national politics, personal general
Tuesday, January 29, 2008
City of Ft. Worth doing the right thing.
Protecting people who choose to live in shelters year after year, from overcrowdedness and disease. It's all about accountability and I am thrilled to see it. It would be nice to ask the Chairperson of the Board of Directors along with the entire Board, why they let this go on for so many years. Good for Fort Worth. Good for the City of Ft. Worth holding the "Non Profit" business accountable, let's hear it for accountability.
read more digg story
Posted by
Suzette
at
Tuesday, January 29, 2008
0
comments
Labels: homelessness, local politics, non profit business
Monday, January 28, 2008
What kind of Democrat Am I?
Or do I still fall under the Party Beliefs/Platform at all?
read more digg story
Posted by
Suzette
at
Monday, January 28, 2008
0
comments
Labels: personal general
Saturday, January 26, 2008
Am I a Democrat?
I do believe in the choice to abort a fetus w/in the first 4 weeks of conception.
I do believe in debating.
I do believe in public schools.
I do believe in values, morality and honesty.
I do believe in rock-n-roll.
I do believe in gay marriages.
I do believe in the human soul.
I do believe in helping the needy.
I do believe in what's right and what's wrong.
I do believe in consequences of wrongdoing of any kind.
I do believe in the pursuit of happiness for all.
I don't believe in my tax dollars being spend on undocumented immigrants in any way.
I don't believe the "War on Drugs" is working in America.
I don't believe we should have gone to war with Iraq. I knew it at the beginning.
I don't believe in giving handouts to adults (tax "rebates" for people who didn't pay taxes included).
With all that said, where does this place me on the scale of Democratness?
Posted by
Suzette
at
Saturday, January 26, 2008
1 comments
Labels: personal general
Friday, January 25, 2008
Vote Now, Vote Here
Save the Polls on this site, VOTE NOW, Vote Here www.fortworthblogorrhea.blogspot.com
Posted by
Suzette
at
Friday, January 25, 2008
0
comments
Labels: Local Blogsites
Wednesday, January 23, 2008
GOOOH - A Plan To Evict Politicians!
Take a look at this:
http://www.goooh.com/Learn.aspx
Posted by
Suzette
at
Wednesday, January 23, 2008
2
comments
Labels: national politics, state politics
Monday, January 21, 2008
Questions for Fort Worth's Mayor's Advisory Commission on Homelessness (MACH)
Dear Ms. Hicks -
Below are just a few of the questions some of us have in regards to the homeless issue. Is it possible to get answers to these questions now, before the City (MACH & Otis Thornton) make their firm decisions on what budget and plans to put before the Council regarding Homelessness? I have attended several meetings on the topic, however, have been unable to find the correct and appropriate venue to ask such questions. Your help in finding out how, when, and from whom to get answers would be greatly appreciated.
1. What exactly is the $2.4M going to buy? Specifics?
2. What are the salaries of the all social workers involved in the Homelessness budget?
3. Where exactly is the $2.4M coming from? How much from City funds? What City Account is it coming from?
4. How "green" is this new building going to be? What energy saving designs and lighting is proposed?
5. Who exactly is going to be doing the accessing of individuals? Degree'd? What is the salary for such person?
6. What does one have to do to get free services? ie, watch educational video, attended class of somesort, etc.
7. What measurable systems are in place for benchmarks on decreasing # of homeless individuals?
8. How much money is going towards street outreach? (Other than engagement team)
9. Is workforce commission on site at Day Resource Center (DRC)? If not, whynot?
10. Where do the persistently and severely mentally ill individuals go? Live? What services are offered to them?
11. Since your plans are promoting "erradication" or "decreasing" homelessness, when does your annual operations budget start to decrease from $1.0M - $1.5M? If not, whynot?
12. How many x-cons does the City currently employ?
13. Is MACH looking at new City employment positions that could hire xcons? If not, whynot? If so, who is investigating this?
14. Explain how housing will help individuals who don't, and have no desire, to work?
15. What systems of accountability are planned for individuals who do not have job and have no desire to work?
16. Is the City doing anything to hold indigent offenders of the law accountable? If so, who can we contact for proof of such?
17. How many individuals claim indigency in Ft. Worth on an annual basis?
18. What is the path of an individual who commits a Class C Misdemeanor such as panhandling or PI? (Pub Intox)
19. If this individual claims indigency, what is path they follow? What consequences are paid for the crime? (Can't say community service - the City does not allow individuals claiming indigency to do Comm. Serv. as the State Law advises)
20. Is anything being done to obtain the enhancement upgrade of the law for Class C Misdemeanors? If so, What? If not, whynot?
21. Who would have the authority to institute more rehab/educational type programs in the City Jail for people who commit Class C Misdemeanors?
22. For the non profits who get hundreds of thousands of dollars to "help" the homeless popluation, what measuring systems are in place for accountability of the dollars spent by these orgs? Are the org's books open to public? Why or Whynot?
23. What systems are planned to ensure that "affordable" and "transitional" housing projects will not become blights in the future?
24. What systems are planned if measurable benchmarks are not obtained? In other words, if the homeless popluation doesn't significantly decrease year after year, what happens then?
25. What homelessness model system in the country is having success after 5 years? If there is one, what are the major contributing factors and are we using them? If none, why are we copying and believing others?
26. Is the City doing anything to promote local companies hiring individuals with criminal background? If so, what? What is the success of such promotion? If not, whynot? If not, what does MACH suggest for these individuals to do for income?
27. How many members of MACH (Mayor's Advisory Committee on Homelessness) are providers, or affiliates, of service providing companies and organizations to the homeless population?
28. How many members of MACH are ordinary individuals (persons w/out any potential to make money from the homeless population) from the direct surrounding area of shelters that have first hand experience in dealing with this population?
29. How much money, if any, is being spent on holding irresponsible, unloving, un-nuturing parents accountable for early childhood parenting (as this IS a "root" cause of homelessness as opposed to a root cause being affordable housing)?
Please don't get me wrong, I'm all for "helping" the homeless individuals as I employ as many as I possibly can and I talk to many of them constantly; I'm just not convinced that the City is spending our monies prudently and as effectively as possible in truly "helping" this population of our community. Again, thanks in advance for any time, help and leadership you can offer me.
Posted by
Suzette
at
Monday, January 21, 2008
6
comments
Labels: district politics, homelessness, indigency, local politics, mental illness
Thursday, January 17, 2008
"I thought we were friends" Politics gone wrong.
I was having a discussion last night with a couple of persons who are passionate about their community and neighborhood. One of them said, "I went to a City meeting and asked a question (which revealed his opinion on the issue) and after the meeting, the Chairman came up to me and said, 'I thought we were friends'." That's what I needed to hear to validate, once again, my personal passing thoughts on politics, especially local politics and I suppose all politics regardless of the level. Let's take for example, a City Council persons job and responsibilities, I believe that it is the job of a City Council Representative (get it -- "Representative") to make it easier for City Hall to "move" for you as a constituent, and "you" as part of a constituency (group of "you"). In order to do that the Representative needs to know how to get my and/or the constituent's problems, concerns, issues and questions addressed and/or answered. In other words, be the liason between "the people" and City Hall. You know the Directors of departments like Code, Police, Planning, Zoning, etc. You can feel the pulse of your constituents and deliver their needs or at least answers or complications with their concerns. The problem that I see today is people getting in politics, getting to know the Directors of Departments, thinking of them as "friends" and not being able to conduct business in fear of being perceived as a "boat rocker," "troublemaker," simply for addressing or asking tough questions. Like the, "I thought we were friends" comment. Why does a hard question provoke the comment of "I thought we were friends?" We can still be friends if you are the Director of Code, I am Council Rep and I bring an issue to you, or I ask a pointed difficult question at a Pre-Council meeting -- it's just a question, it doesn't mean that I am "black balling" you are wanting to cause trouble or I am against you as a person....that's nonsense, can't we all just be mature adults? It may mean, that I do an excellent job and I expect it from all others. Even if I don't agree with "how you run a department" doesn't mean that I don't like or love you as a person. Why are we so afraid of discussions and/or questions? I don't get it! Perhaps because there are too many individuals (drop the "folks" ok) who go into politics without a strong backbone of principles and/or without an agenda to do what's right and best for "the people" in which they represent......too many people who go into politics because they had the money to buy the most signs, tv commercials, name, etc. OR because there is too little of people who really study and know WHO they are actually voting for, too few voters who really know where the candidate comes from, what they stand for, what they are made of, etc. Bottom line, we as mature adults SHOULD be able to AGREE to disagree or DISAGREE to agree. (This is really a rant for me....I would beat my hands on the counter top to get this point across). Tip toeing and cronyism, it's gotta go.
I will probably edit this post as I just sat down, put it down and on the go.....Thanks for reading and Happy New Year.
Posted by
Suzette
at
Thursday, January 17, 2008
0
comments
Labels: corruption in politics, district politics, local politics, national politics
Tuesday, January 15, 2008
Being enslaved to a chain is no life for a social animal
read more digg story
Posted by
Suzette
at
Tuesday, January 15, 2008
0
comments
Labels: dog abuse, local politics